THE INCONVENIENT HUMANFIELD INDEX / 01DANIEL BERRY

READ THE COMPLETE INTRODUCTION

Introduction

04 / 08
THE INCONVENIENT HUMANINTRODUCTION

Institutions attempt related work at a larger scale. Families, churches, markets, political movements, technologies, and laws all shape the conditions in which human capacities become conduct. Sometimes they give an impulse a legitimate purpose and boundary. Sometimes they shame it into concealment, stimulate it for power or profit, or remove the limits that keep its costs from being passed to someone else.

This book follows that pressure from the inside. It is not a comprehensive theory of civilization. It is an inquiry through one life into what becomes visible when institutions meet a particular person’s desire, loyalty, ambition, grief, strength, and need. The same institution may cultivate one capacity while exploiting another. A tradition may preserve a good and still wound the people charged with carrying it. A liberation may correct a genuine injustice and create new forms of pressure. Human systems are no less mixed than the people who build them.

I approach those questions from a conservative moral orientation. I believe liberty depends on responsibility, that family and tradition can carry knowledge no individual invented, that duties matter even when they limit immediate choice, and that a society cannot survive if personal desire becomes its own sufficient justification.

Those commitments do not exempt the institutions I value from scrutiny. A tradition is not vindicated merely because it is old. Authority is not righteous merely because it speaks the language of order. A conservative claim does not become true because progressive institutions may have neglected it, any more than a progressive claim becomes true because universities or professional organizations affirm it.

Evidence outranks ideological comfort.

DANIEL BERRY4